Practices
Services |
Electrical & Computer TechnologiesGroup at a Glance
What Matters to Our ClientsDeep Technical Knowledge Collectively, it’s hard to match our group’s depth and breadth of knowledge, our stability as an organization, and our team-oriented practice. Our clients often choose us—sometimes over much larger firms—because of our strategic focus and the level of expertise and experience—both technical and legal—that we bring to the table. We are business lawyers with technology backgrounds and an expertise in IP law. Our focus is our client’s business and the way the technology and legal protection or threats fit into it; not just on technology per se. Equally important is our practice of creating dedicated client teams that maintain continuity, provide our clients with multiple contact points, and assure a high level of responsiveness and efficiency. We are devoted to the success of our clients. Most of our professionals have advanced degrees and industry experience. Clients value having a team that can hit the ground running with a full and nuanced grasp of the technological and business issues at stake. We work well together and with our clients, and focus on achieving planned goals. Our shareholders have practiced together for many years and know how to combine their legal expertise with the cutting edge technical training of our newest technology specialists, so we deliver the best of both worlds. Our attorneys and technology specialists are comfortable and effective at communicating with inventors, engineers, and researchers on technology, and with business stakeholders on commercial aspects of that technology. They know how important it is to provide clients with the practical input and judgment required for serious decision-making. Our services cover all aspects of clients’ IP needs, sometimes in cooperation with other practice groups in the firm, and include: strategic counseling on the development and management of portfolios; patent and trademark drafting and prosecution; international filing strategies and execution; IP audits; product clearance and design-around advice; due diligence; licensing and tech transfer agreements; patent infringement, validity, and other opinions; litigation; alternative dispute resolution; interferences; and copyright issues. Distinguished Client List Our client list includes widely recognized leaders in the high tech and consumer product industries as well as major universities, defense contractors, start-up companies, VCs, and other investors. They welcome the sophisticated and practical advice we provide on ways to maximize their IP assets in the short term, while achieving their long term business objectives—creating revenue from licensing their technology and potential M&A events, and to minimize risks. Our clients appreciate our responsiveness to them and our dedication to honoring both timelines and budgets. Collaborative Approach Increasingly, technology blurs traditional knowledge boundaries. When a client’s needs call for diverse, specialized knowledge, we seamlessly team with members of other firm practice groups. We take pride in offering our clients comprehensive service that is rich at every point of expertise. We are supported by a dedicated team of paralegals, search specialists, and international filing specialists, working closely with a hand-picked list of law firms in other countries to assist our clients in addressing global matters. We recognize that excellence in the dynamic business and legal environment characteristic of today’s emerging technology requires constant learning. So we invest heavily in on-going training designed to address all areas of IP law, as well as business and industry issues. Our view of working collaboratively extends to our relationship with our clients. We strive for open channels of communication and encourage our clients to keep us informed of major business developments so that we can suggest appropriate mid-course corrections to their IP programs. Areas of ExpertiseExamples of our group's areas of expertise include:
|
View All Group Members Representative Group Clients
Newsstand
January 31, 2012 - Navigating Patent Eligibility for Process ClaimsDecember 2011 - Neil Ferraro Named 2012 Boston Patent Law Association President January 3, 2012 - Wolf Greenfield Welcomes 2012 Promoting Seven Lawyers to New Positions November 2011 - America Invents Act: The Implications of Patent Reform October 12, 2011 - Wolf Greenfield sponsored MIT Forum event on October 12 September 2011 - America Invents Act – Patent Reform is Finally Here Ultramercial v. Hulu (decided 9/15/11) - Federal Circuit Clarifies Limits on Patent-Eligibility of Software Patents September 9, 2011 - IP ALERT—Senate Endorses The Long-Awaited Patent Reform August 16, 2011 - Coming soon: Google gadgets CyberSource v. Retail Decisions (decided 8/16/11) - Processes Equivalent to "Human Mental Work” Not Patent-Eligible American Calcar v. American Honda (decided 6/27/11 - Narrow Disclosure Limits Claim Scope February 25, 2011 - Managing the Pace of Patent Applications February 17, 2011 - WOLF GREENFIELD SEMINAR: Managing IP Risks: The Importance of Obtaining Freedom to Operate Guidance - presentation now available January 1, 2011 - Wolf Greenfield filed 2,749 patent applications and 688 trademark applications in 2010. December 2010 - Wolf Greenfield was ranked #1 in number of patents filed and number of patent attorneys in Mass High Tech’s annual survey December 2010 - Randy Pritizker interviewed in UMass Amherst newsletter Research Corp v. Microsoft (decided 12/8/10) - Federal Circuit Upholds Method Claims Outside the “Machine-or-Transformation” Test After Bilski August 25, 2010 - Presentation to entrepreneurs at MassChallenge August 22, 2010 - Hunter Baker, Ed Gates and Chelsea Loughran presented at the American Chemical Society’s Fall National Meeting August 20, 2010 - BBJ survey ranks Wolf Greenfield #1 in patent attorneys, patents filed and patents obtained July 7, 2010 - A Wolf Greenfield Webinar: Forecasting the Future of Method Patents Post-Bilski — archived replay of webinar now available June 28, 2010 - CLIENT ALERT— Supreme Court Leaves Door Open to Business Method Patents June 17, 2010 - WOLF GREENFIELD SEMINAR: Strategically Building and Monetizing a Patent Portfolio - replay now available February 2010 - Edmund J. Walsh and Andrew J. Tibbetts on the benefits and risks of Open Source software January 2010 - Reassessing The Benefits and Risks of Open Source Software October 15, 2009 - CLIENT ALERT — USPTO Rescinds Controversial Rules Restricting Patent Applications September 28, 2009 - Court Blocks Software that Violates Open Source Terms September 2009 - The Arguments For Patents for Business Methods and Software-Implemented Inventions March 25, 2009 - CLIENT ALERT — Federal Circuit Decision on Controversial PTO Rules February 2009 - Maximizing Intellectual Property Value in Tough Economic Times- Seminar replay now available WHITE PAPER - Energy, Cleantech, and Intellectual Property: Managing Technology Convergence and Protecting Innovation December 20, 2008 - Turning Your Innovations into a Successful Business November 13, 2008 - CLIENT ALERT — Federal Circuit Preserves–with Modifications–Patentability of Business Methods November 12, 2008 - Navigating Technology Collaborations and Joint Ventures—Wolf Greenfield seminar July 1, 2008 - Supreme Court Expands 'Exhaustion' Doctrine: Patent Owners' Right to Collect Downstream Royalties Restricted June 11, 2008 - Supreme Court Expands Exhaustion Doctrine and Restricts Patent Owners From Collecting Downstream Royalties June 11, 2008 - CLIENT ALERT — Supreme Court Expands Exhaustion Doctrine and Restricts Patent Owners From Collecting Downstream Royalties June 9, 2008 - No Downstream Royalties for LG: High Court June 3, 2008 - Legal Climate for Open-Source Users Changes with Litigation and License Revisions, Wolf Greenfield Lawyer Writes in IP Law & Business April 15, 2008 - Seagate Drops Legal Bomb on SSD Memory Maker April, 2008 - Open Source Software: Recent Muscle-Flexing Adds New Risk February 7, 2008 - An Entrepreneur's Guide to the Intellectual Property Galaxy January 9, 2008 - Wolf Greenfield, Boston, Names Two New Shareholders - Boston Intellectual Property Law Firm Promotes Teja, Trevisan January 9, 2008 - Hyde Park Resident Named Shareholder at Boston Law Firm June 20, 2007 - Intellectual Property in China: Balancing Risks With Rewards May 9, 2007 - Supreme Court Decision in KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc. on "Obviousness" May 9, 2007 - CLIENT ALERT — Supreme Court Decision in KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc. on "Obviousness" May 7, 2007 - CLIENT ALERT — Supreme Court Decision in Microsoft Corp. v. AT&T Corp. on Enforcement of Patents Containing Software Outside U.S. May 2007 - Is it "Obvious"?: Long-Awaited Patent Decision Leaves Lawyers Scratching their Heads November 2006 - Accelerated Examination of Patent Applications: Too Good To Be True? June 12, 2006 - Companies sigh relief from Supreme Court's eBay decision June 2006 - Cos. Sigh Relief from Supreme Court’s eBay Decision February 28, 2006 - Open Source in Your Product: Managing the Intellectual Property Risks Q&A Booklet - Q&A on Patents Q&A Booklet - Q&A on Intellectual Property Litigation Q&A Booklet - Q&A on Licensing and Transactions |